Back to Discover

weavatrix-refactor

connector

sergii-ziborov

Transactional refactoring MCP with 11 evidence-backed tools, hash-bound previews, and rollback.

View on GitHub
0 starsSynced Aug 12, 2026

Install to Claude Code

/plugin marketplace add sergii-ziborov/weavatrix-refactor

README

Weavatrix Refactor

Refactor across files without letting the agent guess.

Weavatrix Refactor is a native MCP server for coding agents. It finds a symbol through the repository graph, previews byte-exact edits, reports every same-named occurrence it could not prove, and writes only after an explicit, hash-bound confirmation.

The useful difference is not “AI can rename a word.” It is that the agent gets evidence before the write and a recoverable transaction after it.

Install

Run the native binary through npm:

npx -y weavatrix-refactor mcp /absolute/path/to/repository

Or install it with Cargo:

cargo install weavatrix-refactor --locked
weavatrix-refactor mcp /absolute/path/to/repository

An MCP client can start it directly:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "weavatrix-refactor": {
      "command": "weavatrix-refactor",
      "args": ["mcp", "/absolute/path/to/repository"],
      "env": {"WEAVATRIX_ALLOW_SOURCE_EDITS": "1"}
    }
  }
}

Leave WEAVATRIX_ALLOW_SOURCE_EDITS unset for preview-only sessions. Preview is a read; only a confirmed apply or rollback requires the gate.

For a rename task, expose only the two tools the agent needs:

weavatrix-refactor mcp /absolute/path/to/repository --profile=rename

The rename profile keeps rename_symbol and rollback_last_apply; every unrelated graph and refactor tool is absent and cannot be called. Omit the option (or use --profile=full) for the complete repository-intelligence surface. The narrower catalog reduces repeated agent context; it does not weaken preview hashes, the write gate, the confirmation token, or rollback checks.

A safe cross-file rename in three calls

Suppose two files declare resolveTarget. A bare name is ambiguous, so the server refuses to pick one and returns exact ids:

// rename_symbol
{"symbol":"resolveTarget","new_name":"locateTarget","output_format":"json"}

{
  "status": "NOT_FOUND",
  "reason": "the name matches more than one symbol; pass one of the candidate ids",
  "candidates": [
    "symbol:src/core.ts#function:resolveTarget@2:1",
    "symbol:src/shadow.ts#function:resolveTarget@3:1"
  ]
}

Retry with the intended id. The result is still read-only: it contains the edit plan, content hashes, the proven edit count, and the references the backend refused to guess at.

// rename_symbol
{
  "symbol": "symbol:src/core.ts#function:resolveTarget@2:1",
  "new_name": "locateTarget",
  "output_format": "json"
}

{
  "status": "PLANNED",
  "completeness": "PARTIAL",
  "renamedEdits": 7,
  "uncertainReferences": ["... three named locations ..."],
  "confirmToken": "single-use-token",
  "plan": {"schemaVersion":"weavatrix.edit-plan.v1","files":["..."]}
}

After reviewing the plan, repeat the same operation with the same inputs and its token:

// rename_symbol
{
  "symbol": "symbol:src/core.ts#function:resolveTarget@2:1",
  "new_name": "locateTarget",
  "mode": "apply",
  "confirm_token": "single-use-token",
  "output_format": "json"
}

{"status":"APPLIED"}

This exact flow is exercised against the real stdio MCP server. The repository fixture requires seven edits across three files, preserves four traps (a longer identifier, string, comment, and unrelated shadow), and must still compile; it scores 12/12.

What is automatic today

The eleven tools do not all claim the same level of automation:

LevelToolsWhat the agent receives
Complete preview/apply workflowrename_symbol, rename_related_symbolsA generated plan and token, then a confirmed write by repeating the same operation
Plan-producingchange_signature, edit_symbol, bulk_replace, organize_imports, move_fileByte-exact edits or a review plan; use apply_edit_plan where an edit-plan envelope is returned
Advisorymove_symbol, delete_readinessBlast radius, cycle/architecture risks, or a deletion verdict; no automatic source write
Safety infrastructureapply_edit_plan, rollback_last_applyVerification/application of an edit-plan envelope and drift-safe restoration

The same process also exposes the read-only Weavatrix repository tools, so discovery, impact analysis, planning, and application share one graph revision and one session.

Safety model and exact limits

  • Ambiguous names fail with candidate ids instead of selecting the first match.
  • PARTIAL means the graph proved the edits in the plan but did not prove that no other semantic references exist. uncertainReferences names the places requiring review.
  • Every file in a plan carries a content hash. A changed working tree makes the preview stale instead of applying the old coordinates.
  • Apply requires WEAVATRIX_ALLOW_SOURCE_EDITS=1 plus a short-lived, single-use token bound to that repository and exact recomputed plan.
  • rollback_last_apply refuses to overwrite files that drifted after the transaction.
  • Multi-file writes are journaled and crash-recoverable. They are not observationally atomic to unrelated processes: another process may briefly observe an intermediate filesystem state.

Only edits with proven provenance are applied. A lexical or graph backend is deliberately more conservative than a language server and must not be read as a claim of full compiler semantics.

Measured benchmark, with unlike layers kept separate

The checked-in August 2026 benchmark uses equivalent adversarial TypeScript, Rust, and Python fixtures. Each has seven required edits, four traps, and a build/test gate. Protocol runs count exact o200k_base initialization, catalog, request, and response tokens. Agent runs use the actual cumulative usage reported by Codex CLI with pinned gpt-5.6-sol / medium reasoning. No byte proxy or estimated tokens-per-second conversion is used.

The new rename-only profile kept all nine protocol runs at 12/12 while reducing fixed MCP context from 9,331 to 485 tokens. Its guided TypeScript agent A/B is:

ArmCorrectnessMedian end-to-endMedian input tokens
Naked Codex12/12 x342,602 ms72,169
Weavatrix 1.0.6 --profile=rename12/12 x348,389 ms108,155
Weavatrix 1.0.5 full surface12/12 x358,719 ms275,784
Serena12/12 x368,728 ms388,271

The full agent matrix is 12/12 in all 27 TypeScript/Rust/Python runs; every run also completed operationally and passed the sanitized edit-channel audit. The deterministic protocol matrix also exposed a language-specific Serena defect: its suggested find_symbolrename_symbol flow scored 7/12 on TypeScript in all three runs, while Rust and Python passed. It also found and drove fixes for Rust macro calls and Python f-string/module-level call evidence.

On this toy TypeScript repository naked Codex is still faster and cheaper than the narrowed profile. Weavatrix's demonstrated value is preview-before-write, named uncertainty, stale-plan refusal, explicit authorization, and rollback—not a universal small-repository token win.

See the full methodology, all language medians, raw-result links, and limitations.

Contract

The tool names, schemas, and result states are frozen in contract/refactor-tools.v1.json. All refactor operations are native Rust; the host merges them with the read-only weavatrix-rust engine.

Versions 0.1.x used the JavaScript engine. That line continues as weavatrix-refactor-js and keeps a separate state directory, token store, and rollback journal.

License

MIT.

Rendered live from sergii-ziborov/weavatrix-refactor's GitHub README — not stored, always reflects the source repo.

1 Install Method

NameDescriptionCategorySource
npm packageInstall via npm (stdio transport)mcp-serverweavatrix-refactor

0 Comments

Login required
Log in to post a comment or update on this repo.

No comments yet — be the first to share an update.